Skip to content
Kanonik
Menu
Blog
Browse Blog
On this page

The Kanonik blog

Notes from the team building Kanonik: how the platform is built, why we made the calls we made, and what it takes to make compliance work you can actually prove.

No demo and no sales call: sign up, connect your AI, start working

Somewhere in the history of enterprise software, "book a demo" turned from a courtesy into a gate. The button is the same on every compliance vendor's site, and behind it is the same sequence: a qualification call, a scripted walkthrough of someone else's tenant, a quote that depends on how the call went, and an onboarding plan measured in weeks. For a 50-person company with an audit in four months, that sequence costs more than the license.

Continue reading

An enterprise GRC alternative for teams of 25 to 200

The big GRC suites (ServiceNow IRM, Archer, MetricStream, IBM OpenPages, OneTrust, Diligent, Riskonnect, SAI360, NAVEX, SAP GRC, LogicManager, Workiva, AuditBoard, LogicGate) are built for enterprises with a risk function and a procurement department. They also expect an implementation budget. A 45-person fintech has none of those and still has to pass the same audit. We built Kanonik for that team. It is self-serve with one public price, and your own AI does the work. Every change is checked and approved by a person before it is sealed into a record your auditor can verify offline.

Continue reading

A compliance automation alternative that proves the work instead of collecting it

Compliance automation tools (Vanta, Drata, Sprinto, Secureframe, Hyperproof, TrustCloud) work in much the same way. Each connects to your cloud and your identity provider. It reaches into your repositories as well, and collects evidence from all of them on a schedule. Kanonik never connects to your systems at all. Your own AI does the compliance work through the connections it already has. Kanonik makes every result verifiable: a server-side Verifier checks it and a named person approves it before it is sealed into a record your auditor can confirm offline.

Continue reading

A crosswalk is a claim, not evidence

A coverage report can look finished. Every requirement across four frameworks has a control mapped to it, color-coded, ready to export. Then an auditor asks the one question that decides anything: for this requirement, show me the control operated over the period, and show me the evidence. The mapping cannot answer that. It was never built to.

Continue reading

An open-source GRC alternative that keeps what you chose it for

Teams pick an open-source GRC tool for a reason that has little to do with price. Nobody can hide the record from you. You can read every table and export every row. You can even audit the tool itself. Kanonik keeps that, and takes away the typing you still do by hand. Your own AI drafts the controls and policies and proposes the risks. Kanonik checks each draft before a person on your team approves it. Your auditor can check the result without asking us anything.

Continue reading

No forms and no connector library: your AI does the work and you approve it

Ask anyone who has implemented a legacy GRC platform what the first three months looked like and you will hear about forms. Configuring the control library. Loading the framework crosswalk. Setting up the risk taxonomy, the ownership model, the review workflow, the evidence request cadence. Deciding which of the four hundred fields on the vendor entity are mandatory. None of that is compliance. It is the setup cost of a tool built for a world where humans typed everything in.

Continue reading

We made our security design choices before we had a customer

Corrected 27 September 2026: the statements below on cryptography and encryption now say exactly what production runs; so do the ones on isolation and the network.

Security posture in a young software company usually arrives in a particular order. First the product, then the customers, then the enterprise buyer who sends a 300-question spreadsheet, then the engineer whose job for the next two quarters is to make the answers true. Logging gets extended to cover what the framework asks for, and a supply-chain story is assembled from whatever the build pipeline happened to do.

Continue reading